IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/odi/wpaper/8.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Policy Expectations and Programme Reality: The Poverty Reduction and Labour Market Impact of Two Public Works Programmes in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Anna McCord

Abstract

ESAU Working Paper 8 presents evidence from sample surveys, conducted among beneficiary households in Limpopo and KwaZulu Natal provinces, of the effectiveness of public works programmes in solving the problems of unemployment and poverty in South Africa. The programmes are implemented under the auspices of provincial public works departments. The paper contrasts the Limpopo programme, which provides full-time temporary employment in the majority of cases for dependents who are half male and half female, with the KwaZulu Natal programme, which provides part-time but permanent employment for beneficiaries who are poorer, almost all women and, in majority, household heads. Though the wages paid make a significant contribution to beneficiary households’ cash incomes, the research finds that the multiplicity of objectives set for public works leads to inefficient targeting. The temporary public employment model does not increase the longer-term employability of selected beneficiaries, in a labour market characterised by an excess supply of unskilled and semi-skilled labour. Former beneficiaries return to unemployment, and their household incomes drop. The permanent,part-time, employment model implemented in KwaZulu Natal, in which beneficiaries are selected by their communities on grounds of poverty, is more effective as a means of supplementing the incomes of the poor.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna McCord, 2004. "Policy Expectations and Programme Reality: The Poverty Reduction and Labour Market Impact of Two Public Works Programmes in South Africa," Working Papers 8, Economics and Statistics Analysis Unit (ESAU), Overseas Development Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:odi:wpaper:8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.odi.org.uk/esau/publications/working_papers/Esau_8_South_Africa.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne Case & Anu Garrib & Alicia Menendez & Analia Olgiati, 2013. "Paying the Piper: The High Cost of Funerals in South Africa," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 62(1), pages 1-20.
    2. Anna McCord & Dirk Ernst van Seventer, 2004. "The economy-wide impacts of the labour intensification of infrastructure expenditure in South Africa," SALDRU/CSSR Working Papers 093, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town.
    3. Charles Meth, 2004. "Half Measures: The ANC's Unemployment and Poverty Reduction Goals," Working Papers 04089, University of Cape Town, Development Policy Research Unit.
    4. Geeta Kingdon & John Knight, 2007. "Unemployment in South Africa, 1995--2003: Causes, Problems and Policies," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), vol. 16(5), pages 813-848, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Unemployment; poverty; public works programmes; South Africa; labour market;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:odi:wpaper:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Vicky Tongue). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.