Author
Abstract
This paper addresses the persistent challenge of resource dependence in the world's poorest countries, focusing on the ten poorest African nations where natural- resource rents average 14% of income. It argues that four decades of conventional policy advice, which treated resource dependence primarily as a revenue management problem, have failed to help these countries. While stabilization funds and permanent-income frameworks aim to smooth consumption, they do not answer the fundamental question of how to transform resource wealth into permanent productive capacity capable of generating income after rents decline. The paper identifies a critical research gap in industrial-policy literature: many African least developed countries (LDCs) occupy a unique position characterized by weak administrative capacity and small domestic markets, but possess temporarily large fiscal space created by resource rents. This combination creates a "race against the clock," as the global energy transition and rapid technological change are shortening the economic life of both hydrocarbons and critical minerals. The paper argues that the goal of resource policy must shift from "revenue smoothing" to "productive-capacity replacement" before this fiscal window closes. Empirical analysis reveals that the failure of resource booms did not result from a lack of investment, but an inability to convert capital into productivity. To assess this issue, the paper undertakes two complementary growth decompositions for eleven African economies, distinguishing resource-intensive countries from successful diversifiers. The results show that while many resource-intensive economies accumulated physical capital, their total factor productivity (TFP) was often negative, and labor productivity collapsed after commodity cycles peaked. In contrast, a group of "African diversifiers"—such as Ethiopia, Ghana, and Tanzania—achieved sustained gains by directing public investment toward labor-intensive manufacturing and tradable services, even without heavy resource endowments. To address these failures, the paper proposes a rent-financed "Big Push" framework. Unlike traditional models focused on domestic demand, this strategy is value-chain-oriented, emphasizing the connection of firms and workers to regional and global production systems. The framework prioritizes the creation of export platforms (special economic zones), trade-enabling infrastructure, and human capital for tradable production. It advocates for a strict fiscal hierarchy where resource revenues are treated as "transformation finance" rather than recurrent income, separating a dedicated "transformation window" from short- term stabilization needs. Ultimately, the paper warns that delayed transformation is, in practice, no transformation. As technological substitution and climate-consistent scenarios reduce the long-term value of resources, African LDCs must use their remaining rents to build competitive non-resource sectors. The "race against the clock" suggests that the greatest wealth of these nations is not the resources themselves, but the brief opportunity they provide to fund a permanent productive economy.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ocp:rpcoen:rp_13-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Center for the New South's Customer service The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Policy Center for the New South's Customer service to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ocppcma.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.