Author
Abstract
This paper is the third in a series of country and comparative studies that together comprise a research program on services as drivers of economic growth and structural transformation in the Global South. The paper analyzes the pattern of Tunisia's services-led economic growth from 2012- 2022 using a specialized three-category framework: knowledge services (KS), enabling services (ES), and local services (LS). Using data from the OECD Trade in Value Added (TiVA), Trade in Employment (TiM), and Input-Output databases, the study evaluates Tunisia’s structural transformation against regional peers Morocco and Egypt, as well as EU15 and US benchmarks. The analysis focuses on indicators of global value chain (GVC) integration, domestic production linkages, employment structure and external demand, and productivity to determine if Tunisian services are serving as engines of growth and export-led convergence. The analysis reveals a structural trajectory that is unique in the North African dataset: Tunisia entered the period with KS firms importing foreign specialized intermediates at rates matching or exceeding EU15 levels, providing an initial structural advantage over both Morocco and Egypt. Yet Tunisia systematically surrendered that advantage in the decade to 2022 as foreign input sourcing declined across every major KS sub-sector, while the EU15 benchmark rose. Upstream GVC participation, meanwhile, remained below EU15 levels in all but one KS sector, confirming that initial input openness never converted into deep structural embedding in global production networks. The result is a services economy that has drifted in an unfavorable direction in terms of composition: the KS GDP share has declined, while public administration has expanded, and forward GVC integration has weakened across most tradable sub-sectors. Reversing this trajectory requires macroeconomic stabilization as a precondition, combined with deliberate investment to scale professional and technical services—the one KS sub-sector that has demonstrated international resilience—and to deepen the ICT sector's GVC embedding, before its initial structural advantages erode further.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ocp:rpaeco:rp05_26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Center for the New South's Customer service The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Policy Center for the New South's Customer service to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ocppcma.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.