Author
Abstract
This paper examines the evolution of China’s services sector between 2012 and 2022, analyzing the country’s structural transformation based on a novel three-tier taxonomy: knowledge services (KS), enabling services (ES), and local services (LS). Using sixteen quantitative indicators from OECD databases, the study evaluates China’s transition in comparison to the EU15 benchmark, highlighting three core challenges: manufacturing rebalancing, labor absorption, and global integration. Three primary findings emerge. First, while manufacturing’s share of GDP in China has stabilized at approximately 29% due to active industrial policy, manufacturing employment has decoupled from output as automation has reduced labor intensity. Second, the services sector has absorbed this released labor, but the composition is problematic: local services (LS) have absorbed the bulk of new jobs at low productivity levels, while high-productivity gains in enabling services (ES) have generated limited direct employment. Knowledge services (KS) remain dynamic but are currently too small and skill-constrained to serve as a primary growth engine. Third, China’s external posture has shifted toward an ‘inward turn’ in direct services exports, countered by a strengthening indirect upstream channel via which producer services are increasingly embedded in other countries’ exports. The paper concludes that China faces a critical productivity/employment trade-off: a transition dominated by local services preserves social stability through job creation, but risks a structural ceiling on aggregate growth. Successful rebalancing will require resolving the structural conditions—specifically skill availability, geographic matching, and openness to foreign inputs—necessary to scale high-productivity knowledge services.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ocp:rpaeco:pp29_26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Center for the New South's Customer service The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Policy Center for the New South's Customer service to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ocppcma.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.