IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ocp/ppaper/pb20-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Budget to Underpin European Global Ambition in the Next Seven Years

Author

Listed:
  • Iván MARTÍN

Abstract

On February 20-21, the Heads of State or Government of the European Union began the last phase of negotiation of the EU’s Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027, the Union’s seven-year budget. Although that European Council made little progress—a long tradition at this stage of negotiations within the EU—discussions focused on the proposed reductions in structural funds and the funds to support the Common Agricultural Policy, and the resulting net balance of funds for each of the member states. Funds for external action, which in the initial proposal by the European Commission were set to be substantially increased, in particular for the Neighborhood and sub-Saharan Africa, were limited to a marginal increase of around 4%, in the most recent proposal from the EU Council Presidency. It is unlikely that the amounts for external action will be revised again significantly in the rest of the negotiation process. As things stand, there are legitimate doubts whether the budget proposals discussed so far are up to the ambitions of EU as a global player at a time when this is most needed. The coronavirus epidemy may prompt EU leaders to reach a quick agreement, but it also runs the risk of rendering Europe more self-centred and less interested in global affairs and detract financial resources to address internal challenges and the impending economic recession.

Suggested Citation

  • Iván MARTÍN, 2020. "A Budget to Underpin European Global Ambition in the Next Seven Years," Policy notes & Policy briefs 1918, Policy Center for the New South.
  • Handle: RePEc:ocp:ppaper:pb20-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.policycenter.ma/sites/default/files/PB%20-%2017-20%20%28IVAN%20Martin%20%29%20%281%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ocp:ppaper:pb20-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Center for the New South's Customer service (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ocppcma.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.