IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ocp/pbecon/pb20_26.html

A New World Trade Architecture with Three Regimes Takes Shape in 2026

Author

Listed:
  • Hung Q. Tran

Abstract

World trade was more resilient than expected during 2025. Its growth probably resulted from the way the rest of the world reacted to the U.S. tariffs. Other factors also had an impact, including moves by exporters to the U.S. in the first half of 2025 to get ahead of the tariffs, and the boom in global tech capital expenditures driven by investment in artificial intelligence (AI). The trade pattern observed in 2025 and early 2026 could point to a new architecture of world trade. There is no longer a coherent global system based on consensus decision making and the cardinal principle of non-discrimination. Rather, global trade is increasingly fracturing into three overlapping but distinct regimes, driven by different dynamics and ways of doing business. Most countries besides the U.S. and China (n-2) will likely coalesce around major regional trade agreements (RTAs). The other two regimes are driven more and more by the geopolitical priorities of the two superpowers, an arrangement under which individual trade partners are in disadvantaged positions relative to them. This emerging world trade architecture of three regimes appears to be a second-best solution to the trade havoc in 2025; and less efficient than an open rules-based trade system. Each regime will evolve in terms of how it functions, and will affect economic activities in response to problems inherent in its configuration.

Suggested Citation

  • Hung Q. Tran, 2026. "A New World Trade Architecture with Three Regimes Takes Shape in 2026," Policy briefs on Economic Trends and Policies 2611, Policy Center for the New South.
  • Handle: RePEc:ocp:pbecon:pb20_26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.policycenter.ma/sites/default/files/2026-04/PB-20-26HungTran.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ocp:pbecon:pb20_26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Center for the New South's Customer service The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Policy Center for the New South's Customer service to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ocppcma.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.