IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ocp/pbagri/pb_55-26.html

Historic Aid Cuts: How is Africa Reacting?

Author

Listed:
  • Otaviano Canuto
  • Hafez Ghanem
  • Karim El Aynaoui

Abstract

There was a historic decline in Official Development Assistance (ODA) in 2025. Foreign aid to developing countries from members of the OECD-DAC fell by some 23%, the largest decline on record and the second consecutive annual decline. Aid to Africa fell by more than 25%. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) described this decline in ODA to Africa as “a shock like no other.” It differs from previous shifts in foreign assistance because of its scope and depth, as well as the speed, simultaneity, and unexpected nature of the cuts. Moreover, these cuts are occurring at a time when other sources of finance for Africa—including multilateral institutions and NGOs—are facing their own financing problems. Chinese lending to Africa has also declined. New Chinese loan commitments fell from a peak of $29 billion in 2016 to just $2.1 billion in 2024, while debt-service payments on earlier loans have continued to rise. As a result, Africa now pays more to China in debt service than it receives in new disbursements. At the same time, African countries are burdened by large and increasingly unsustainable debts. About half of Africa’s 54 countries spend more than 10% of their budget revenue on interest payments.

Suggested Citation

  • Otaviano Canuto & Hafez Ghanem & Karim El Aynaoui, 2026. "Historic Aid Cuts: How is Africa Reacting?," Policy briefs on Agriculture Markets, Policies and Food Security 2607, Policy Center for the New South.
  • Handle: RePEc:ocp:pbagri:pb_55-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.policycenter.ma/sites/default/files/2026-09/PB_55-26_.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ocp:pbagri:pb_55-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Center for the New South's Customer service The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Policy Center for the New South's Customer service to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ocppcma.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.