IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Health and Labour Force Participation




This paper examines the relationship between health and labour force participation using data from the first three waves of the Survey of Family, Income and Employment (SoFIE) (2002/05). Using various health measures, the results show that health is significantly related to labour force participation, even after accounting for certain types of endogeneity. The results of the standard regression models including individual chronic diseases indicate that five out of the nine chronic diseases considered have a significant negative relationship with labour force participation once other factors are controlled for. These diseases are: psychiatric conditions (depression, manic depression or schizophrenia); stroke; heart disease; diabetes and high blood pressure. For psychiatric conditions, stroke and diabetes the negative relationship with full-time work is larger than that for parttime work (ie, the chance of working full-time rather than being inactive is reduced more than the reduction in the chance of working part-time rather than being inactive). This suggests that the presence of these diseases is associated not only with lower participation but also with working fewer hours. Various modelling techniques and a more general measure of overall health (self-rated health) are then used to account for possible endogeneity. The results of these models indicate that poorer self-rated health is associated with a reduced chance of participating in the labour force. The relationship between self-rated health and labour market participation is found to be significant even when time-constant unobserved variables are controlled for and when self-rated health is adjusted to account for possible rationalisation of labour force participation using self-rated health. More specifically, a health shock (measured using adjusted or unadjusted self-rated health) was found to be associated with a reduction in the chance of participating. While the results from all models are in a similar direction, they have different strengths and the preferred estimators are those from the fixed effects model. Using various assumptions, the model results were used to estimate the impact at the economy level. The point estimates from these models indicate that if there was an improvement in health (ie, no negative health shocks and/or everyone had excellent average health) an additional 12,700 to 66,800 people may participate; that represents a 0.7% to 3.6% increase in the total number of people participating. Based on the limitations of the models discussed in the paper it is more sensible to assume that, if there was an improvement in health, the additional number of people who may participate is likely to be between 5,300 and 38,700; that is, a 0.3% to 2.1% increase in the total number of people participating. The results do not control for unobserved variables that vary over time. They also do not allow for the “feedback effect”; that is, that participation could influence health. As such, the results do not address causality but only establish relationships between health and participation. Feasible instruments were explored to try to instrument health, thus making it possible to take into account both unobserved variables that change over time and causality, but no suitable instrument was found.

Suggested Citation

  • Heather Holt, 2010. "Health and Labour Force Participation," Treasury Working Paper Series 10/03, New Zealand Treasury.
  • Handle: RePEc:nzt:nztwps:10/03

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Eric French, 2005. "The Effects of Health, Wealth, and Wages on Labour Supply and Retirement Behaviour," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 72(2), pages 395-427.
    2. Michael Baker & Mark Stabile & Catherine Deri, 2004. "What Do Self-Reported, Objective, Measures of Health Measure?," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 39(4).
    3. Cai, Lixin, 2010. "The relationship between health and labour force participation: Evidence from a panel data simultaneous equation model," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 77-90, January.
    4. Ettner, Susan L., 1996. "New evidence on the relationship between income and health," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 67-85, February.
    5. Martin Browning & Anne Moller Dano & Eskil Heinesen, 2006. "Job displacement and stress-related health outcomes," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(10), pages 1061-1075.
    6. David A. Love & Paul A. Smith, 2010. "Does health affect portfolio choice?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(12), pages 1441-1460, December.
    7. James Banks & Sarah Smith, 2006. "Retirement in the UK," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 40-56, Spring.
    8. Deborah A. Cobb-Clark & Steve Stillman, 2006. "The Retirement Expectations of Middle-Aged Individuals," CEPR Discussion Papers 540, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
    9. Katherine Henderson & Grant M. Scobie, 2009. "Household Debt in New Zealand," Treasury Working Paper Series 09/03, New Zealand Treasury.
    10. Dwyer, Debra Sabatini & Mitchell, Olivia S., 1999. "Health problems as determinants of retirement: Are self-rated measures endogenous?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 173-193, April.
    11. Lixin Cai & Guyonne Kalb, 2006. "Health status and labour force participation: evidence from Australia," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(3), pages 241-261.
    12. Bound, John & Schoenbaum, Michael & Stinebrickner, Todd R. & Waidmann, Timothy, 1999. "The dynamic effects of health on the labor force transitions of older workers," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 179-202, June.
    13. Disney, Richard & Emmerson, Carl & Wakefield, Matthew, 2006. "Ill health and retirement in Britain: A panel data-based analysis," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 621-649, July.
    14. Dhaval Dave & R. Inas Rashad & Jasmina Spasojevic, 2008. "The Effects of Retirement on Physical and Mental Health Outcomes," Southern Economic Journal, Southern Economic Association, vol. 75(2), pages 497-523, October.
    15. Lixin Cai & Guyonne Kalb, 2004. "Health Status and Labour Force Participation: Evidence from the HILDA Data," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2004n04, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    16. Anderson, Kathryn H. & Burkhauser, Richard V., 1984. "The importance of the measure of health in empirical estimates of the labor supply of older men," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 16(3-4), pages 375-380.
    17. Kathryn H. Anderson & Richard V. Burkhauser, 1985. "The Retirement-Health Nexus: A New Measure of an Old Puzzle," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 20(3), pages 315-330.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Health; Chronic Diseases; Labour Force Participation;

    JEL classification:

    • J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nzt:nztwps:10/03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Web and Publishing Team, The Treasury). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.