IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

New Modalities in Tax Decision-Making: Applying European experience to Australia

Listed author(s):
  • Yuri Grbich
Registered author(s):

    This article criticises the current situation in judicial decision making which it says is overly dominated by ‘old fashioned’ conservative legalistic analysis. It compares this with the UK’s experience of the European challenge to its Common Law. The article urges Australian jurisprudence to learn from the European civil law. By this means, it suggests, core public policy imperatives will be permitted to shape the tax decision making agenda. This would make Australian tax judges more accountable for the application of policies against tax avoidance, and other policies behind statutory rules. The article concludes by urging Australian tax teachers to contribute to the development of a culture of accountability by judges and to take the lead in criticising the performance of judges in how they deal with policy and principles when making decisions.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by ATAX, University of New South Wales in its series Taxation with number eJournal of Tax Research Vol 2 No. 1.

    in new window

    Length: 30 pages
    Date of creation: 05 May 2004
    Handle: RePEc:nsw:discus:84
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Cliffbrook Campus, Sydney NSW 2052

    Phone: +61 (0) 2 9385 9333
    Fax: +61 (0) 2 9385 9380
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsw:discus:84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Research Assistant)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.