New Modalities in Tax Decision-Making: Applying European experience to Australia
This article criticises the current situation in judicial decision making which it says is overly dominated by ‘old fashioned’ conservative legalistic analysis. It compares this with the UK’s experience of the European challenge to its Common Law. The article urges Australian jurisprudence to learn from the European civil law. By this means, it suggests, core public policy imperatives will be permitted to shape the tax decision making agenda. This would make Australian tax judges more accountable for the application of policies against tax avoidance, and other policies behind statutory rules. The article concludes by urging Australian tax teachers to contribute to the development of a culture of accountability by judges and to take the lead in criticising the performance of judges in how they deal with policy and principles when making decisions.
|Date of creation:||05 May 2004|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Cliffbrook Campus, Sydney NSW 2052|
Phone: +61 (0) 2 9385 9333
Fax: +61 (0) 2 9385 9380
Web page: http://www.atax.unsw.edu.au
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.atax.unsw.edu.au/research|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsw:discus:84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Research Assistant)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.