IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Best Practice of Participatory Budgeting in Germany - Chances and Limi ts


  • Jochen, Franzke


Participatory budgets (or citizen's budgets) are a modern form of the involvement of inhabitants in the discussion of the municipal budget and/or allocation of municipal public finances in a direct, permanent and independent way. Participatory budgets are formal procedures for any city all over the world, independent from their size and number of population. The instrument is very flexible and adaptable to different politico-administrative systems and variable political orientations. It's suitable to the current governance trend of local reforms and can be combined with other instruments of local democracy. The idea of including citizens in the local budgetary decision process was invented first in Brazil in the city of Porto Alegre in 1989 under the name Orçamento Participativo. Since then the idea spread over Brazil, other countries of Latin and North America, Asia, Africa and finally Europe. But according to different legal frameworks, varied socio-economical conditions and diverse political intentions of the supporters of participatory budgets the procedure in different countries is highly specific. Therefore, the main research question of this contribution is to find out, how participatory budgets can be adapted to the legal, political and administrative framework condition at local level in Germany. This includes the question of the possible additional benefit of the procedure for local democracy. However, it has been taken into account, that the data about the conditions and results of participatory budgets in Germany are frequently based only on information of the projects organizers. Scientific evaluations of individual projects are still rather rare (with the exception of Berlin-Lichtenberg and Cologne). At this stage of developments of participatory budgeting in Germany it may be useful, to map the state of the art, to describe the standards of the procedure in Germany and to affiliate some further research qu estions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jochen, Franzke, 2010. "Best Practice of Participatory Budgeting in Germany - Chances and Limi ts," Apas Papers 238, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS.
  • Handle: RePEc:nsu:apasro:238

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Ani Matei & Lucica Matei & Teodora Dinu, 2009. "Marketing of Local Public Services under the Reduction of Administrative Expenditures," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 3(03(532)), pages 07-28, March.
    2. Eric Miller, 2008. "An Assessment of CES and Cobb-Douglas Production Functions: Working Paper 2008-05," Working Papers 19992, Congressional Budget Office.
    3. Saunders, Peter, 1985. "Public Expenditure and Economic Performance in OECD Countries," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(01), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Gilles Mourre, 2009. "Underutilisation of Labour in (Continental Western) Europe: A Detailed GDP Accounting Perspective," Working Papers CEB 09-050.RS, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    5. Rainer Klump & Peter McAdam & Alpo Willman, 2007. "The long-term sucCESs of the neoclassical growth model," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 94-114, Spring.
    6. Gheorghe Zaman & Zizi Goschin, 2007. "Elasticity of Substitution for Production Functions in Romania and other Countries," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 2(2(507)), pages 3-12, February.
    7. George Gelauff & Arjan Lejour, 2006. "Five Lisbon highlights; the economic impact of reaching these targets," CPB Document 104, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsu:apasro:238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ani Matei). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.