IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nsr/niesrp/47.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysing the Chancellor’s Tax Options

Author

Listed:
  • Ed Cornforth

Abstract

With tax rises likely in the upcoming Autumn Budget, this policy brief argues that the most realistic option is to look at one of the four main taxes: corporation tax, income tax, employee National Insurance Contributions (NICs) or Value Added Tax (VAT). This being the case, the rest of the brief explores the effects on the economy of raising these taxes. Using our Global Macroeconometric Model (NiGEM) this scenario compares different tax options available to the Chancellor at the forthcoming Autumn Budget. We assume that the government aims to raise total net annual revenue by £30 billion by 2029–30, in line with external forecasts of how much the Chancellor needs to raise to meet her current budget fiscal rule (the "stability rule"). The analysis suggests that a rise in the rate of income tax would appear to be the least economically damaging option available to the Chancellor at this time. Although there are risks around raising income tax rates such as a negative effect on labour supply or a larger than expected reduction in aggregate consumption, it is unlikely that, even if these risks came to pass, any other option would be better.

Suggested Citation

  • Ed Cornforth, 2025. "Analysing the Chancellor’s Tax Options," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Policy Papers 47, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrp:47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://niesr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/PP47-Analysing-the-Chancellors-Tax-Options.pdf?ver=EaKtsRSPbabvjrg9YWqU
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrp:47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Library & Information Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/niesruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.