IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nsr/escoed/escoe-dp-2022-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Improving Public Understanding of Economic Statistics: Media Reporting Labour Market Statistics

Author

Listed:
  • Claire Cathro
  • Johnny Runge
  • Katharine Stockland
  • Nida Broughton
  • Louis Shaw

Abstract

This study explores the role of the media as an intermediary for the communication of economic statistics to the UK public. To do so, we used the monthly labour market release, published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), as a case study. We interviewed eight journalists and conducted a content analysis of 458 news stories that covered ONS labour market statistics, to examine how the labour market release is used by journalists and how the information affects the subsequent media coverage. We also ran a small-sample online experiment with journalists and journalism students to investigate how changes to the presentation of labour market statistics may affect media coverage. We find that the ONS labour market release drives media reporting. The information in the monthly releases and the main quote from the ONS are central to the way the media report the labour market statistics, both in terms of the focus of reporting, and what numbers are used. This means that the ONS, through their releases, has an important role in shaping and improving communication to the public, even if their releases are not necessarily consumed directly by the public. It is therefore important for the ONS, and similar organisations, to monitor the impact on media reporting when fundamental changes are made to key economic statistics releases, and to consider how changes to existing releases or the introduction of additional outputs could potentially help improve media reporting. In particular, it would be useful to explore ways to provide more context to figures or make it easier for journalists to identify other contexts themselves; continue to develop and improve administrative data sources that are sometimes easier to convey to the public compared to data based on surveys; and focus on explaining statistics that are important, but are seen as hard to communicate by journalists, such as economic inactivity. More broadly, we propose that the wider economics community should consider their role as an intermediary more carefully, including how to establish stronger relationships and support journalists' reporting on economic statistics more effectively, and whether and how to communicate more directly with the wider public.

Suggested Citation

  • Claire Cathro & Johnny Runge & Katharine Stockland & Nida Broughton & Louis Shaw, 2022. "Improving Public Understanding of Economic Statistics: Media Reporting Labour Market Statistics," Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers ESCoE DP-2022-27, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
  • Handle: RePEc:nsr:escoed:escoe-dp-2022-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://escoe-website.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/10104904/ESCoE-DP-2022-27.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Communication; trust in statistics; public understanding; economic statistics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D90 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - General
    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsr:escoed:escoe-dp-2022-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ESCoE Centre Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/escoeuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.