IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nse/doctra/m2016-04.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Savoir compter, savoir coder - Bonnes pratiques du statisticien en programmation

Author

Listed:
  • E. L'HOUR

    (Insee)

  • R. LE SAOUT

    (Insee)

  • B. ROUPPERT

    (Insee)

Abstract

Clean statistics come with clean code : Statistics come from computer programs. In a published study, these figures are more readable when editorial techniques are well used. But few rules govern the upstream coding tasks. As a consequence, to run or to change code written by someone else can prove to be a strenuous burden. A readable code increases individual and collective work efficiency by limiting errors, by making review easier, and by making the code more sustainable. For someone preparing a study, both conducting a literature search and identifying key messages are crucial tasks. Similarly, expressing the relevant business need, identifying the available means and planning adequate actions can save valuable time when coding. Moreover, short sentences built around “one idea – one sentence†and no useless jargon make a message clearer. Likewise, readable programs are short, well structured, and use meaningful names. Finally, in the same manner as a published study has been reviewed several times, code reviews and defining tests seem critical.

Suggested Citation

  • E. L'Hour & R. Le Saout & B. Rouppert, 2016. "Savoir compter, savoir coder - Bonnes pratiques du statisticien en programmation," Documents de Travail de l'Insee - INSEE Working Papers :m2016-04, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.
  • Handle: RePEc:nse:doctra::m2016-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/4469245
    File Function: Document de travail "Méthodologie Statistique" de la DMCSI numéro M2016/04
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nse:doctra::m2016-04. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: INSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inseefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.