IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/not/notgts/11-01.html

Robust methods for detecting multiple level breaks in autocorrelated time series

Author

Listed:
  • David I. Harvey
  • Stephen J. Leybourne
  • A. M. Robert Taylor

Abstract

The contribution of this paper is twofold. First we extend the large sample results provided for the augmented Dickey-Fuller test by Said and Dickey (1984) and Chang and Park (2002) to the case of the augmented seasonal unit root tests of Hylleberg et al. (1990) [HEGY], inter alia. Our analysis is performed under the same conditions on the innovations as in Chang and Park (2002), thereby allowing for general linear processes driven by (possibly conditionally heteroskedastic) martingale difference innovations. We show that the limiting null distributions of the t-statistics for unit roots at the zero and Nyquist frequencies and joint F-type statistics are pivotal, while those of the t-statistics at the harmonic seasonal frequencies depend on nuisance parameters which derive from the lag parameters characterising the linear process. Moreover, the rates on the lag truncation required for these results to hold are shown to coincide with the corresponding rates given in Chang and Park (2002); in particular, an o(T 1/2) rate is shown to be sufficient. The second contribution of the paper is to explore the use of data-dependent lag selection methods in the context of the augmented HEGY tests. Information criteria based methods along with sequential rules, such as those of Ng and Perron (1995) and Beaulieu and Miron (1993), are compared.

Suggested Citation

  • David I. Harvey & Stephen J. Leybourne & A. M. Robert Taylor, 2011. "Robust methods for detecting multiple level breaks in autocorrelated time series," Discussion Papers 11/01, University of Nottingham, Granger Centre for Time Series Econometrics.
  • Handle: RePEc:not:notgts:11/01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/research/groups/grangercentre/documents/11-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:not:notgts:11/01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tsnotuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.