IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/not/notcre/13-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Selection into Employment Sectors in Urban Ghana and Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Priscilla Twumasi Baffour

Abstract

The paper analyses labour market participation and selection into specific employment sectors in urban areas of Ghana and Tanzania using urban worker survey data from 2004 to 2006 in pooled sample models. A baseline participation model and multinomial logit model of occupational choice is applied. Results from the baseline models suggest determinants of participation differ across the two countries pointing out the heterogeneity in the two labour markets. Specifically in Tanzania, education is found to increase the probability of employment but the reverse is the case in Ghana as education increases the probability of not-working (unemployment). In terms of selection into specific sectors, the results suggest both labour markets are characteristic of a preference for formal sector employment by the highly educated as all levels of education are found to monotonically increase the probability of public and private (formal) sector employment and decrease the probability of selfemployment informal sector). Among age cohorts, young people face morechallenges in accessing formal sector jobs in both countries compared to older people.

Suggested Citation

  • Priscilla Twumasi Baffour, 2013. "Selection into Employment Sectors in Urban Ghana and Tanzania," Discussion Papers 13/02, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
    • Handle: RePEc:not:notcre:13/02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/credit/documents/papers/13-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vincent Leyaro & Priscilla Twumasi Baffour & Oliver Morrissey & Trudy Owens, 2014. "Determinants of Urban Labour Earnings in Tanzania, 2000/01-06," Discussion Papers 14/03, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:not:notcre:13/02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hilary Hughes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cenotuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.