IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ngi/dpaper/26-5.html

From Fields to Factories: Reform Sequencing and Structural Transformation in China, Vietnam, and Uzbekistan

Author

Listed:
  • Jahongir Begmatov

    (The Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Uzbekistan)

  • Guanie Lim

    (National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, Tokyo, Japan)

Abstract

This paper examines whether differences in reform sequencing during the early reform period are associated with differences in output stability and structural transformation. It compares three transition economies - China (1978-1988), Vietnam (1986-1996), and Uzbekistan (2017-2024) - using a structured comparative case study design. Drawing on the reform sequencing literature, the analysis is organized around the expectation that micro-first sequences, in which agricultural and enterprise reforms precede large-scale macroeconomic and external liberalization, are associated with more stable output and a more balanced pattern of structural change than macro-first sequences. Using data from the World Bank's World Development Indicators, the analysis proceeds through within-case studies and a structured cross-case comparison using descriptive statistics and aligned trend graphs. The patterns observed are broadly consistent with the expectation that sequencing matters. China and Vietnam, which followed micro-first reform sequences, achieved higher average growth rates underpinned by early agricultural productivity gains, avoided negative growth, and exhibited a relatively balanced reallocation of resources across sectors. Uzbekistan's macro-first sequence, which began with exchange rate unification and trade liberalization, also avoided recession, but growth was lower on average and appears to have depended more heavily on expansionary fiscal policy and state-led investment. Structural transformation in Uzbekistan was characterized by rapid industrial expansion without a preceding surge in agricultural productivity, while services expanded more gradually. Labour reallocation patterns and foreign direct investment trajectories reinforce these differences. The paper contributes to the reform sequencing literature by incorporating a contemporary transition into a common comparative framework and offers cautious policy insights for transition economies, particularly regarding the role of micro-level institutional reforms in supporting durable growth and structural transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jahongir Begmatov & Guanie Lim, 2026. "From Fields to Factories: Reform Sequencing and Structural Transformation in China, Vietnam, and Uzbekistan," GRIPS Discussion Papers 26-5, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:ngi:dpaper:26-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://grips.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2000290
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karsten Staehr, 2005. "Reforms and Economic Growth in Transition Economies: Complementarity, Sequencing and Speed," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 2(2), pages 177-202, December.
    2. Karsten Staehr, 2005. "Reforms and Economic Growth in Transition Economies: Complementarity, Sequencing and Speed," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 2(2), pages 177-202, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mr. Sanjeev Gupta & Mr. Alejandro Simone & Mr. Alex Segura-Ubiergo, 2006. "New Evidence on Fiscal Adjustment and Growth in Transition Economies," IMF Working Papers 2006/244, International Monetary Fund.
    2. Kim, Byung-Yeon & Jukka Pirttila, 2003. "The Political Economy of Reforms: Empirical Evidence from Post-Communist Transition in the 1990s," Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2003 120, Royal Economic Society.
    3. Gérard Duchêne & Ramona Jimborean & Boris Najman, 2006. "Structure of Monetary Assets in Transition Economies: Financial Innovation and Structural Transformation," Post-Print hal-00270544, HAL.
    4. Mwangi S. Kimenyi, 2006. "Economic Reforms and Pro-Poor Growth: Lessons for Africa and other Developing Regions and Economies in Transition," Working papers 2006-02, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    5. Stefanescu, Răzvan & Dumitriu, Ramona, 2015. "Creşterea economică a României între 1980 şi 2013 [The Economic Growth of Romania between 1980 and 2013]," MPRA Paper 61592, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Dawid Piątek & Katarzyna Szarzec & Michał Pilc, 2013. "Economic freedom, democracy and economic growth: a causal investigation in transition countries," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 267-288, September.
    7. Mr. Juan Zalduendo, 2005. "Pace and Sequencing of Economic Policies," IMF Working Papers 2005/118, International Monetary Fund.
    8. Andrej Susjan & Tjasa Redek, 2008. "Uncertainty and Growth in Transition Economies," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(2), pages 209-234.
    9. Dawid Piątek & Katarzyna Szarzec & Michał Pilc, 2014. "Wolność gospodarcza i demokracja a wzrost gospodarczy krajów transformujących się," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 3, pages 367-395.
    10. Karsten Staehr, 2005. "Reforms and Economic Growth in Transition Economies: Complementarity, Sequencing and Speed," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 2(2), pages 177-202, December.
    11. Bruno Merlevede & Koen Schoors, 2007. "On the Speed of Economic Reform - A Tale of the Tortoise and the Hare: Evidence from Transition Countries," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 29-50.
    12. Piatek, Dawid & Baszynski, Adam & Jarmolowicz, Waclaw & Szarzec, Katarzyna, 2011. "The economic transformation and its results in selected European countries," MPRA Paper 42152, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Roberto DELL'ANNO & Stefania VILLA, 2012. "Growth in Transition Countries: Big Bang versus Gradualism," CELPE Discussion Papers 122, CELPE - CEnter for Labor and Political Economics, University of Salerno, Italy.
    14. Artur Radziwill & Pawel Smietanka, 2009. "EU's Eastern Neighbours: Institutional Harmonisation and Potential Growth Bonus," CASE Network Studies and Analyses 0386, CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research.
    15. Rosefielde, Steven, 2004. "An abnormal country," BOFIT Discussion Papers 15/2004, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    16. Jan Babecky & Tomas Havranek, 2014. "Structural reforms and growth in transition," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 22(1), pages 13-42, January.
    17. Igor Pelipas & Alexander Chubrik, 2008. "Market Reforms and Growth in Post-socialist Economies: Evidence from Panel Cointegration and Equilibrium Correction Model," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series wp936, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    18. Iwasaki, Ichiro & Kumo, Kazuhiro, 2016. "Decline and Growth in Transition Economies: A Meta-Analysis," CEI Working Paper Series 2016-9, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    19. T. Aksoy & P. Manasse, 2018. "The Persistence-Resilience Trade-off in Unemployment: The Role of Labor and Product Market Institutions," Working Papers wp1121, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    20. Ziv Chinzara & Radhika Lahiri, 2012. "Economic growth and inequality patterns in the presence of costly technology adoption and uncertainty," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 280, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ngi:dpaper:26-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask the person in charge to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gripsjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.