Defending a Star: Coordinating the Defense of a Network
This experiment focuses on a contest played over a star network of 6 nodes. By placing targets in a network, the value of a target is dependent on its connectivity to other targets. The experiment compares the cases where the defense is centrally planned by a defense planner with a case where the defense is coordinated by six individuals each placed at one node in the network. By additionally varying how many targets the attacker may target, the experimental design consists of a 2 × 2 design. Attackers tend to over exert effort on the Center Node whereas defenders tend to place too little effort on the Center Node (with one exception). These attack and defense allocations lead to defenders earning smaller than equilibrium profits (again with one exception). It appears that Defense Planners manage to plan a defense better than the Coordinated Defenders when facing an attacker who may only target one node. However, Defense Planners are not certain to perform better than Coordinated Defenders as the Planner earns a smaller profit on average (but is less volatile in his earnings).
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:net:wpaper:1225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Nicholas Economides)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.