Do Doctors Practice Defensive Medicine?
`Defensive medicine' is a potentially serious social problem: if fear of liability drives health care providers to administer treatments that do not have worthwhile medical benefits, then the current liability system may generate inefficiencies many times greater than the costs of compensating malpractice claimants. To obtain direct empirical evidence on this question, we analyze the effects of malpractice liability reforms using data on all elderly Medicare beneficiaries treated for serious heart disease in 1984, 1987, and 1990. We find that malpractice reforms that directly reduce provider liability pressure lead to reductions of 5 to 9 percent in medical expenditures without substantial effects on mortality or medical complications. We conclude that liability reforms can reduce defensive medical practices.
|Date of creation:||Feb 1996|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||published as Kessler, Daniel and Mark McClellan. "Do Doctors Practice Defense Medicine?," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1996, v111(2,May), 353-390.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.nber.org
More information through EDIRC
This item is featured on the following reading lists or Wikipedia pages:
- Medical malpractice in Wikipedia English ne '')
- Talk:Medical malpractice in Wikipedia English ne '')
- Comparison of the health care systems in Canada and the United States in Wikipedia English ne '')
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:5466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.