IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/35845.html

Limits to Arbitrage and Prediction Market Efficiency: the Case of PredictIt

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Zitzewitz

Abstract

PredictIt is a CFTC-regulated US prediction market focused on political outcomes. It was very successful in attracting participants in the 2016-22 period, running liquid markets on topics predecessors had tried unsuccesfully. During this period, investors were limited to $850 positions in each contract, which limited arbitrage trading. PredictIt exhibited much larger pricing biases than previously studied prediction markets. Bid prices often persistently added to more than 110, implying an immediate arbitrage profit even after fees. Prices exhibited an overpricing of longshots that was larger than in other prediction markets. The experience of PredictIt suggests that limiting stakes may undermine the ability of prediction markets to accurately price event probabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Zitzewitz, 2026. "Limits to Arbitrage and Prediction Market Efficiency: the Case of PredictIt," NBER Working Papers 35845, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35845
    Note: AP LE POL
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w35845.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G13 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Contingent Pricing; Futures Pricing
    • G40 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.