IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/35702.html

Rational Inattention to Discrete Choices with Stable Priors

Author

Listed:
  • Bruno Pellegrino

Abstract

How does prior information affect discrete choice? In the seminal rational inattention model of Matějka and McKay (2015), multinomial logit arises from the discrete choice of agents who are uncertain about choice payoffs and who have access to a flexible information acquisition technology (RI-logit). A key limitation of this powerful framework is the lack of known solutions that allow the decision maker's prior information to vary across choices: obtaining such solutions has remained an open problem in this literature. In this paper, I solve the RI-logit model analytically for two related families of priors known respectively as Positive Stable and Tempered Stable distributions. In my solution, the decision maker's prior information enters the choice probabilities through a choice-specific parameter, which can be read as shifting either the ex-ante expected utility of a risk-neutral decision maker, or the ex-ante riskiness perceived by a risk-averse one. These results complete the RI-logit framework by separating prior information from information that is endogenously acquired, and expand its empirical applications by making it possible to study how choice probabilities react to changes in prior information.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruno Pellegrino, 2026. "Rational Inattention to Discrete Choices with Stable Priors," NBER Working Papers 35702, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35702
    Note: EFG IFM IO
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w35702.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D11 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Theory
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.