IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/35431.html

Assessing the Benefits of Optimized Agentic AI Systems for Asset Pricing

Author

Listed:
  • Ralph S. J. Koijen
  • Bradford Levy

Abstract

Evaluating optimized AI systems for asset pricing is fundamentally difficult for two reasons. First, models are trained on all data, implying that any backtest or analysis using historical data suffers from look-ahead bias. In addition, markets are reflexive — as investors adopt AI, prices adjust — which may erode the very patterns the AI system was trained to exploit. We introduce a real-time, out-of-sample benchmark designed to sidestep both problems. The benchmark measures how well AI systems can explain contemporaneous stock returns around earnings announcements using only information available at announcement time, including the text of the announcement itself. Applying this benchmark to a range of agentic AI systems — which extract structured signals from earnings call transcripts and optimize over those signals — we find that the best-optimized systems more than double the explained variation in returns relative to standard benchmarks (R2 increasing from 8% to close to 20%). We show that AI-based optimization can deliver efficiency gains relative to traditional machine learning methods while also improving interpretability as our approach produces human-readable economic mechanisms that explain price movements. These learned rules can be compared to the drivers of realized returns in existing asset pricing models to identify missing sources of variation in a data-driven, self-evolving way that integrates empirical learning with economic structure. We release an SDK for researchers to improve on our results. Saturating this benchmark would represent fundamental progress in understanding how capital markets process firm-level information.

Suggested Citation

  • Ralph S. J. Koijen & Bradford Levy, 2026. "Assessing the Benefits of Optimized Agentic AI Systems for Asset Pricing," NBER Working Papers 35431, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35431
    Note: AP
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w35431.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bradford Levy, 2026. "Caution Ahead: Numerical Reasoning and Look‐Ahead Bias in AI Models," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 64(3), pages 1139-1188, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - General
    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.