IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/35384.html

When Medicaid Pays the Bill: Routine Vision Benefits, Eye Care Use, and Eyeglasses Spending Among Dual-eligible Medicare Enrollees

Author

Listed:
  • Michel H. Boudreaux
  • Brandy Lipton
  • Melissa McInerney

Abstract

Vision problems are prevalent among Medicare beneficiaries, with the majority having treatable conditions including uncorrected refractive error and cataracts. However, traditional Medicare does not cover routine eye exams or eyeglasses, and Medicare Advantage supplemental vision benefits often include low annual limits. We examine the effects of Medicaid routine vision benefits among adults dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid, a population with high rates of vision impairment, morbidity, and disability. Using 2002-2019 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data and a difference-in-differences design, we estimate that Medicaid routine vision benefits increase past-year eye exams, eyeglasses purchases, and Medicaid spending on eyeglasses while reducing out-of-pocket spending. We also find suggestive evidence of spillovers to Medicare Advantage spending on eyeglasses, consistent with Medicaid routine vision coverage inducing additional eyeglasses purchases among Medicare Advantage enrollees with supplemental vision benefits, although estimates are modest.

Suggested Citation

  • Michel H. Boudreaux & Brandy Lipton & Melissa McInerney, 2026. "When Medicaid Pays the Bill: Routine Vision Benefits, Eye Care Use, and Eyeglasses Spending Among Dual-eligible Medicare Enrollees," NBER Working Papers 35384, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35384
    Note: AG EH
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w35384.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel H. Boudreaux & Brandy J. Lipton, 2021. "Medicaid Benefit Generosity and Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from Medicaid Adult Vision Benefits," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 56(2), pages 539-569.
    2. Lipton, Brandy J. & Decker, Sandra L., 2016. "The effect of Medicaid adult vision coverage on the likelihood of appropriate correction of distance vision: Evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 258-267.
    3. Lurie, N. & Kamberg, C.J. & Brook, R.H. & Keeler, E.B. & Newhouse, J.P., 1989. "How free care improved vision in the health insurance experiment," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 79(5), pages 640-642.
    4. Marika Cabral & Colleen Carey & Sarah Miller, 2025. "The Impact of Provider Payments on Health Care Utilization of Low-Income Individuals: Evidence from Medicare and Medicaid," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 106-143, February.
    5. Katherine Baicker & Jacob A. Robbins, 2015. "Medicare Payments and System-Level Health-Care Use: The Spillover Effects of Medicare Managed Care," American Journal of Health Economics, MIT Press, vol. 1(4), pages 399-431, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boudreaux, Michel & Lipton, Brandy, 2018. "Medicaid Benefit Generosity and Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from Medicaid Adult Vision Benefits," MPRA Paper 83916, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Liu, Xiao & Burge, Gregory S., 2024. "The effect of the new cooperative medical scheme on rural labor supply in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    3. Elizabeth L. Munnich & Michael R. Richards, 2020. "Treatment flows after outsourcing public insurance provision: Evidence from Florida Medicaid," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(11), pages 1343-1363, November.
    4. Lipton, Brandy J. & Decker, Sandra L., 2016. "The effect of Medicaid adult vision coverage on the likelihood of appropriate correction of distance vision: Evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 258-267.
    5. Christopher C. Afendulis & Michael E. Chernew & Daniel P. Kessler, 2017. "The Effect of Medicare Advantage on Hospital Admissions and Mortality," American Journal of Health Economics, MIT Press, vol. 3(2), pages 254-279, Spring.
    6. Lipton, Brandy J. & Decker, Sandra L., 2015. "The effect of health insurance coverage on medical care utilization and health outcomes: Evidence from Medicaid adult vision benefits," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 320-332.
    7. Lee, Ajin, 2025. "How does medicaid managed care affect provider behavior? New evidence from spillovers on private health care," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    8. Geruso, Michael & Richards, Michael R., 2022. "Trading spaces: Medicare's regulatory spillovers on treatment setting for non-Medicare patients," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    9. Rosalba Rombaldoni, 2012. "The use of cost-sharing to control demand and the implications for equity: some theoretical and empirical evidence for Italy," Working Papers 1211, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Department of Economics, Society & Politics - Scientific Committee - L. Stefanini & G. Travaglini, revised 2012.
    10. Nathan Kettlewell, 2019. "Utilization and Selection in an Ancillaries Health Insurance Market," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 86(4), pages 989-1017, December.
    11. Yevgeniy Feyman & Steven D. Pizer & Austin B. Frakt, 2021. "The persistence of medicare advantage spillovers in the post‐Affordable Care Act era," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 311-327, February.
    12. Laura Connolly & Matt Hampton & Otto Lenhart, 2024. "Labor mobility and the Affordable Care Act: Heterogeneous impacts of the preexisting conditions provision," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 157-191, January.
    13. Liran Einav & Amy Finkelstein & Yunan Ji & Neale Mahoney, 2020. "Randomized trial shows healthcare payment reform has equal-sized spillover effects on patients not targeted by reform," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(32), pages 18939-18947, August.
    14. Lee R. Mobley & Pedro Amaral & Tzy-Mey Kuo & Mei Zhou & Srimoyee Bose, 2017. "Medicare modernization and diffusion of endoscopy in FFS medicare," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, December.
    15. Christopher Trenholm & Embry M. Howell & Dana Hughes & Sean Orzol, "undated". "The Santa Clara County Healthy Kids Program: Impacts on Children's Medical, Dental, and Vision Care," Mathematica Policy Research Reports a5c7ef47c4844db694c8bc8e3, Mathematica Policy Research.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H0 - Public Economics - - General
    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.