IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/34930.html

When Do Financial Frictions Matter for Misallocation?

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Bai
  • Dan Lu
  • Xu Tian
  • Yajie Wang

Abstract

This paper reassesses the role of financial frictions in capital misallocation through a model disciplined by both firm-level borrowing costs and the average revenue product of capital (ARPK). Using Chinese manufacturing data, we document substantial dispersion in ARPK, alongside a strong positive relationship between ARPK and the borrowing costs firms face---patterns absent in U.S. data. We develop a heterogeneous-firm model with endogenous firm-specific borrowing costs and additional capital distortions modeled as exogenous wedges. In this model, eliminating financial frictions raises total factor productivity (TFP) by 25 percentage points. In contrast, without other capital distortions, removing financial frictions increases TFP by less than 2 percentage points. The stark difference arises from the interaction between financial frictions and permanent firm-level distortions, which generate endogenous financial heterogeneity and selection, making productive firms the most constrained. Our findings suggest that financial frictions can be highly distortionary when other sources of misallocation are present.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Bai & Dan Lu & Xu Tian & Yajie Wang, 2026. "When Do Financial Frictions Matter for Misallocation?," NBER Working Papers 34930, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:34930
    Note: EFG
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w34930.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • E2 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment
    • F3 - International Economics - - International Finance

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:34930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.