IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/33972.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Power Asymmetry in Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Designs

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Kaliski
  • Michael P. Keane
  • Timothy Neal

Abstract

In a fuzzy regression discontinuity (RD) design, the probability of treatment jumps when a running variable (R) passes a threshold (R0). Fuzzy RD estimates are obtained via a procedure analogous to two-stage least squares (2SLS), where an indicator I(R > R0) plays the role of the instrument. Recently, Keane and Neal (2023, 2024) showed that 2SLS t-tests suffer from a “power asymmetry”: 2SLS standard errors are spuriously small (large) when the 2SLS estimate is close to (far from) the OLS estimate. Here, we show that a similar problem arises in Fuzzy RD. Hence, if the endogeneity bias is positive, the Fuzzy RD t-test has little power to detect true negative effects, and inflated power to find false positives. The problem persists even if the instrument is very strong. To avoid this problem one should rely exclusively on the intent-to-treat (ITT) regression to assess significance of the treatment effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Kaliski & Michael P. Keane & Timothy Neal, 2025. "The Power Asymmetry in Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Designs," NBER Working Papers 33972, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:33972
    Note: TWP
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w33972.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:33972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.