IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/32683.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Intertemporal Choice Bracketing and the Measurement of Time Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Yonas Alem
  • John Loeser
  • Aprajit Mahajan

Abstract

Economists routinely rationalize financial behaviors and prominent empirical anomalies using time preferences inferred from money earlier or later (MEL) responses; yet theory suggests such choices could instead reflect investment returns. We conduct a lab-in-the-field experiment in Kenya combining repeated MEL, randomized large cash transfers, and an illiquid savings product. Neither time preferences nor marginal investment returns exclusively rationalize choices: randomized cash transfers significantly affect MEL responses, yet subjects also fail to arbitrage across economically equivalent MEL and savings opportunities. However, we provide evidence that heterogeneity in time preferences drives the predictive power of MEL for savings decisions, rationalizing routine practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Yonas Alem & John Loeser & Aprajit Mahajan, 2024. "Intertemporal Choice Bracketing and the Measurement of Time Preferences," NBER Working Papers 32683, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:32683
    Note: DEV
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w32683.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text is generally limited to series subscribers, however if the top level domain of the client browser is in a developing country or transition economy free access is provided. More information about subscriptions and free access is available at http://www.nber.org/wwphelp.html. Free access is also available to older working papers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:32683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.