IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/31778.html

Why Do Index Funds Have Market Power? Quantifying Frictions in the Index Fund Market

Author

Listed:
  • Zach Y. Brown
  • Mark L. Egan
  • Jihye Jeon
  • Chuqing Jin
  • Alex A. Wu

Abstract

The number of index funds increased drastically from 2000 to 2020, driven in part by the emergence of exchange-traded funds. Yet, despite the proliferation of near-identical products, fee dispersion remains large and persistent, implying substantial market power. Motivated by evidence of strong inertia and other demand-side frictions, we develop a dynamic model of demand and supply for index funds that incorporates inertia, information frictions, and heterogeneous preferences. Using a new identification strategy that leverages fund-level new-sales data, we estimate that only 3–5% of households update their index holdings each month. However, counterfactual simulations show that while eliminating inertia alone reduces average fees by only 20%, eliminating both information frictions and inertia cuts them by 80%. This highlights that high information frictions—and their interaction with inertia—are the primary barriers to reallocation. Finally, we show that while ETF entry reduced expense ratios through both lower costs and additional product-market competition, demand-side frictions substantially dampened this competitive effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Zach Y. Brown & Mark L. Egan & Jihye Jeon & Chuqing Jin & Alex A. Wu, 2023. "Why Do Index Funds Have Market Power? Quantifying Frictions in the Index Fund Market," NBER Working Papers 31778, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:31778
    Note: AP CF IO
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w31778.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • G5 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance
    • L0 - Industrial Organization - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:31778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.