IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/30261.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

New Evidence on the Demand for Advice within Retirement Plans

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Reuter
  • David P. Richardson

Abstract

We study demand for advice within defined contribution retirement plans offered by 23 institutions where TIAA is sole recordkeeper. Advice seeking increases with age, account balance, annual contribution level, web access, and changes in marital status. More provocatively, participants who invest solely through target date funds—the dominant default investment option—are significantly less likely to seek any form of advice throughout the age distribution, raising the possibility that reliance upon defaults crowds out advice seeking. Advice seeking increases significantly following the introduction of online tools, but is only weakly correlated with market returns and investment menu changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Reuter & David P. Richardson, 2022. "New Evidence on the Demand for Advice within Retirement Plans," NBER Working Papers 30261, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:30261
    Note: AG
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w30261.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G51 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance - - - Household Savings, Borrowing, Debt, and Wealth

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:30261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.