IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/27843.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Man vs. Machine Learning: The Term Structure of Earnings Expectations and Conditional Biases

Author

Listed:
  • Jules H. van Binsbergen
  • Xiao Han
  • Alejandro Lopez-Lira

Abstract

We introduce a real-time measure of conditional biases in firms' earnings forecasts. The measure is defined as the difference between analysts' expectations and a statistically optimal unbiased machine-learning benchmark. Analysts' conditional expectations are, on average, biased upwards, and the bias increases in the forecast horizon. These biases are associated with negative cross-sectional return predictability, and the short legs of many anomalies contain firms with excessively optimistic earnings. Further, managers of companies with the greatest upward-biased earnings forecasts are more likely to issue stocks. Commonly-used linear earnings models do not work out-of-sample and are inferior to those provided by analysts.

Suggested Citation

  • Jules H. van Binsbergen & Xiao Han & Alejandro Lopez-Lira, 2020. "Man vs. Machine Learning: The Term Structure of Earnings Expectations and Conditional Biases," NBER Working Papers 27843, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27843
    Note: AP CF
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w27843.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alejandro Lopez-Lira & Yuehua Tang, 2023. "Can ChatGPT Forecast Stock Price Movements? Return Predictability and Large Language Models," Papers 2304.07619, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    2. Olivier Dessaint & Thierry Foucault & Laurent Fresard, 2024. "Does Alternative Data Improve Financial Forecasting? The Horizon Effect," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 79(3), pages 2237-2287, June.
    3. Hanauer, Matthias X. & Kalsbach, Tobias, 2023. "Machine learning and the cross-section of emerging market stock returns," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    4. Jérôme Dugast & Thierry Foucault, 2020. "Equilibrium Data Mining and Data Abundance," Working Papers hal-03053967, HAL.
    5. Hoang, Daniel & Wiegratz, Kevin, 2022. "Machine learning methods in finance: Recent applications and prospects," Working Paper Series in Economics 158, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    6. Dugast, Jerome & Foucault, Thierry, 2021. "Equilibrium Data Mining and Data Abundance," HEC Research Papers Series 1393, HEC Paris.
    7. Matthew Harding & Gabriel F. R. Vasconcelos, 2022. "Managers versus Machines: Do Algorithms Replicate Human Intuition in Credit Ratings?," Papers 2202.04218, arXiv.org.
    8. Zeyang Chen & Yu-Jane Liu & Juanjuan Meng & Zeng Wang, 2023. "What’s in a Face? An Experiment on Facial Information and Loan-Approval Decision," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2263-2283, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D84 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Expectations; Speculations
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G31 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies
    • G4 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.