IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/1693.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of the Runaway Office on Union Certification Elections in Clerical Units

Author

Listed:
  • Beatrice J. Freiberg
  • William T. Dickens

Abstract

The law prohibits firms from moving work to avoid unionization. Still, many employees fear that joining a union may cost them their jobs. This paper assesses the impact of that fear on how clerical workers vote in union certification elections. Two data sets were collected and analyzed for this purpose, and three measures of the firms' ability to relocate office work were developed. Clerical workers in offices that were judged to be easier to relocate were found to be more likely to report that the fear of job loss was important to their voting decision. Those who voted against the union were most likely to report that the fear that they would lose their jobs was a significant consideration. Further, workers in units judged to be most easily relocated were found to have a 7 to 30% lower probability of voting union than those who were in less mobile jobs.

Suggested Citation

  • Beatrice J. Freiberg & William T. Dickens, 1985. "The Impact of the Runaway Office on Union Certification Elections in Clerical Units," NBER Working Papers 1693, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:1693
    Note: LS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w1693.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. G L Clark & K Johnston, 1987. "The Geography of US Union Elections 1: The Crisis of US Unions and a Critical Review of the Literature," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 19(1), pages 33-57, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:1693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.