IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbr/nberwo/15538.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

When Safe Proved Risky: Commercial Paper During the Financial Crisis of 2007-2009

Author

Listed:
  • Marcin Kacperczyk
  • Philipp Schnabl

Abstract

Commercial paper is one of the largest money market instruments and has long been viewed as a safe haven for investors seeking low risk. However, during the financial crisis of 2007-2009, the commercial paper market experienced twice the modern-day equivalent of a bank run with investors unwilling to refinance maturing commercial paper. We analyze the supply of and demand for commercial paper and show that, in contrast to previous turbulent episodes, the crisis centered on commercial paper issued by, or guaranteed by, financial institutions. We describe the importance of Federal Reserve's interventions in restoring stability of the market. Finally, we propose three possible explanations for the sharp decline of the commercial paper market: substitution to alternative sources of financing by commercial paper issuers, adverse selection, and institutional constraints among money market funds.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcin Kacperczyk & Philipp Schnabl, 2009. "When Safe Proved Risky: Commercial Paper During the Financial Crisis of 2007-2009," NBER Working Papers 15538, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:15538
    Note: AP CF
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w15538.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. (Various), 2007. "Book Reviews," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), pages 171-177.
    2. Marcin Kacperczyk & Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh & Laura Veldkamp, 2009. "Rational Attention Allocation Over the Business Cycle," NBER Working Papers 15450, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Oecd, 2009. "Monitoring Review of Korea," OECD Journal: Competition Law and Policy, OECD Publishing, vol. 9(3), pages 107-137.
    4. Oecd, 2008. "DAC Peer Review of Denmark," OECD Journal on Development, OECD Publishing, vol. 8(4), pages 7-125.
    5. Markus K. Brunnermeier, 2009. "Deciphering the Liquidity and Credit Crunch 2007-2008," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 23(1), pages 77-100, Winter.
    6. (Various), 2007. "Book Reviews," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1), pages 171-179.
    7. (Various), 2007. "Book Reviews," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3), pages 187-192.
    8. (Various), 2007. "Book Reviews," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2), pages 175-187.
    9. George A. Akerlof, 1970. "The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 84(3), pages 488-500.
    10. Oecd, 2008. "DAC Peer Review of Canada," OECD Journal on Development, OECD Publishing, vol. 8(4), pages 263-387.
    11. Timothy Q. Cook & Robert K. LaRoche (eds), 1993. "Instruments of the money market," Monograph, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, number 1993iotm.
    12. Timothy Q. Cook & Robert K. LaRoche (eds), 1993. "Instruments of the money market (foreword)," Monograph, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, number 1993iotmm.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:15538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.