IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbp/nbpmis/386.html

Labour Force Survey in Poland, 1995–2020. A Proposal for Data Revision

Author

Listed:
  • Adrian Domitrz

    (Narodowy Bank Polski)

  • Olga Zajkowska

    (Institute of Economics, Polish Academy of Sciences
    Narodowy Bank Polski)

Abstract

The Labour Force Survey (LFS) (pol. Badanie Aktywności Ekonomicznej Ludności – BAEL) is a key labour market study used both for estimating the most important labour market indicators and for conducting in-depth analyses. The survey results provide unique, highly detailed information on, among other things, economic activity, employment, economic inactivity, and unemployment. The population to which the BAEL results are generalized is adjusted every 10 years based on census results. After each census, the Statistics Poland (GUS) revises historical data based on the new population structure, but only going back a few years, which causes problems with the comparability of results over time. At the same time, these data are characterized by numerous periods of disrupted comparability caused by changes in the survey methodology over the years. In particular, the new classification of the respondents’ status on the labour market introduced in 2021 and the modified definition of the reference population have led to a break in the continuity of time series. The aim of this paper is to present a proposed correction to historical LFS data that will enable the construction of comparable and methodologically consistent data covering a long time period since 1995. This procedure consists of two stages: (1) adjusting the weights used to generalize the study results, and (2) adjusting the labour market status classification, thus unifying it across the entire analyzed time period. This procedure, to the best of the authors' knowledge, allows for the most accurate reconciliation of population series and labour market status since 1995. This allows for the implementation of analyses and in-depth forecasts on the longest possible time series. The following sections of this work outline the subsequent stages of deriving the final form of the proposed Polish LFS (BAEL) time series. The underlying assumptions and statistical methods used to obtain the presented results are described in detail. The final section contains conclusions and implications for the analysis of developments in the Polish labour market. The procedure presented here can also be used in the context of other representative surveys, such as the national Household Budget Survey (BBGD) conducted by the Statistics Poland (GUS), as well as international surveys such as the Labour Force Survey (LFS). The adjusted Polish LFS (BAEL) time series are available in a separate Excel file, which allows other researchers to use the adjusted data in their analyses of the Polish labour market.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrian Domitrz & Olga Zajkowska, 2026. "Labour Force Survey in Poland, 1995–2020. A Proposal for Data Revision," NBP Working Papers 386, Narodowy Bank Polski.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbp:nbpmis:386
    Note: The authors thank Dr. Agnieszka Zgierska and her team for their valuable remarks and comments.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://static.nbp.pl/publikacje/materialy-i-studia/386_en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General
    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbp:nbpmis:386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jakub Growiec (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nbpgvpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.