IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nbb/reswpp/200405-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sectoral vs. country diversification benefits and downside risk

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Emiris

    () (National Bank of Belgium, Research Department)

Abstract

Recently, the advantage of country diversification relative to sector diversification has been questioned especially against the background of the European monetary and financial integration. Correct estimates of the correlation matrix are central for the evaluation of the relative diversification gains. These estimates should take into account the time-varying and asymmetric behaviour of the correlation process particularly in the context of major changes in volatility and market trends. In this paper, the ADCC (Asymmetric Dynamic Conditional Correlation) model developed by Cappiello et al. (2003) is used to estimate the conditional correlation and volatility of weekly country, sector and country/sector returns indexes over 1990-2003. This model offers a relatively flexible specification for the conditional correlation process that is still computationally feasible for estimation on larger portfolios. The estimation results point to an increase in the average correlation between country indexes during the last five years, but at the same time there is an important decline in the correlation between sector indexes. This trend is observed in both the euro area and the word-wide portfolios and is therefore not specific to the European integration process. At the same time, the volatility in the sector indexes has increased remarkably and in a relatively stronger way compared to the volatility in the country indexes. Both trends tend to cancel out in the calculations of optimal portfolio variance: lower sector correlation is offset by higher sector volatility and higher country correlation is neutralised by the relative lower volatility in country indexes. Therefore no clear trend appears from comparing the relative conditional variances of sector and country portfolios. After taking into account the effect of average returns, it turns out that country diversification is still the dominant strategy for world portfolios, whereas sector diversification is more interesting for euro area portfolios.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Emiris, 2004. "Sectoral vs. country diversification benefits and downside risk," Working Paper Research 48, National Bank of Belgium.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbb:reswpp:200405-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nbb.be/doc/oc/repec/reswpp/wp48.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    portfolio diversification; correlation; international finance;

    JEL classification:

    • C5 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbb:reswpp:200405-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/bnbgvbe.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.