IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nam/wpaper/1105.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Double, Double Toil and Trouble: An Investigation on Occult Forces Expenditures in Southern Benin

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Lemay-Boucher

    (Heriot-Watt University)

  • Vincent Somville

    ()

  • Joël Noret

    (Université Libre de Bruxelles)

Abstract

In many African societies, beliefs in `occult forces' play a crucial role in mobilizing powerful social energies. Anthropologists, and more recently economists, have also stressed the importance of magico-religious practices in supporting redistributive norms and the important role played by these norms in (and against) economic development. This study is the first to use quantitative evidence about the recourse to magico-religious protection. We measure expenditures in protection, using first-hand data collected in Benin. These expenditures are widespread and independent of people's education, religion and ethnicity. They are as high as 6% of the household head's income, and 4,5% of the total household income, on average, and exceed the expenditures made on important items such as school furnitures or electricity. We show that the main factors that affect the recourse to magico-religious protection are economic success and the death of relatives, colleagues or friends. Moreover, we find that redistribution of income and protection are substitutes: economically successful people who do not make gifts to their relatives and acquaintances tend to resort more heavily to magico-religious protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Lemay-Boucher & Vincent Somville & Joël Noret, 2011. "Double, Double Toil and Trouble: An Investigation on Occult Forces Expenditures in Southern Benin," Working Papers 1105, University of Namur, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:nam:wpaper:1105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.fundp.ac.be/eco/economie/recherche/wpseries/wp/1105.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2011
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nam:wpaper:1105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marie-Helene Mathieu). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/fsfunbe.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.