IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mtl/montde/8739.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Technological Change in Interdependent Bureacracies: Was Rome's Failure Economic Or Military

Author

Listed:
  • Dudley, L.

Abstract

This Paper Extends a Model of a Three-Person Hierarchy Developed by Tyrole (1986) to the Case of Fiscal Or Military Bureaucraties. It Is Demonstrated That a Decrease in Economies of Scale in the Application of Military Force Results in a Contraction of Territorial Boundaries and an Expansion of the Role of the State. an Attempt Is Than Made to Examine Whether This Model Can Explain the Decline of Roman Civilization in Western Europe. the Evidence Presented Is Consistent with the Hypothesis That the Gradual Introduction of a Series of Improvements in Cavalry Combat Increased the Cost of Controlling Territory. One Result Was a Rise in Taxation --A Shift in the State's Internal Frontier Between Private and Public Activity in Favor of the Latter. Another Consequence Was a Decrease in the Area Under Effective Military Control -- an Inward Movement of the State's External Frontier.

Suggested Citation

  • Dudley, L., 1987. "Technological Change in Interdependent Bureacracies: Was Rome's Failure Economic Or Military," Cahiers de recherche 8739, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
  • Handle: RePEc:mtl:montde:8739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mtl:montde:8739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sharon BREWER (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/demtlca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.