IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Invariance, Nonlinear Models and Asymptotic Tests

  • Dagenais, M.G.
  • Dufour, J.M.

Several Asymptotic Tests Proposed in the Literature Are Shown Not to Be Invariant to Changes in Measurement Units Or, More Generally to Various Transformations Which Leave Both the Model and the Null Hypothesis Invariant. the Test Involved Include the Wald Test, a Variant of the Lagrange Multiplier Test, Neyman's 'C' Test, Durbin's Procedure (1970), Hausman-Type Tests and a Number of Tests Suggested by White (1982). for All These Procedures, Simply Changing Measurement Units in a Way That Leaves Both the Form of the Model and the Null Hypothesis Invariant Can Lead to Vastly Different Answers. This Problem Is Illustrated by Considering Regression Models with Box-Cox Transformations on the Variables. We Observe, in Particular, That Various Consistent Estimators of the Information Matrix Lead to Test Procedures with Different Invariance Properties. We Then Establish General Sufficient Conditions Which Ensure That Neyman's Test Is Invariant to Transformations Which Leave Invariant the Form of the Model Further, We Give Conditions Under Which a Generalized 'C' Test Applicable to General Restrictions, Is Invariant to the Algebraic Formulation of the Restrictions. in Many Practical Cases Where Wald-Type Tests Lack Invariance, We Find That a Modification of the 'C' Test Is Invariant and Hardly More Costly to Compute Than Wald Tests. This Computational Simplicity Stands in Contrast with Other Invariant Tests Such As the Likelihood Ratio Test. We Conclude That Non-Invariant Asymptotic Tests Should Be Avoided Or Used with Great Care. Further in Many Situations, the Suggested Modification of the 'C' Test Yields an Attractive Substitute to the Wald Test and to Other Invariant Tests.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques in its series Cahiers de recherche with number 8738.

as
in new window

Length: 44P. pages
Date of creation: 1987
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:mtl:montde:8738
Contact details of provider: Postal: CP 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7
Phone: (514) 343-6540
Fax: (514) 343-5831
Web page: http://www.sceco.umontreal.ca

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mtl:montde:8738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sharon BREWER)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.