IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/msh/ebswps/2018-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bootstrapping tail statistics: Tail quantile process, Hill estimator, and confidence intervals for highquantiles of heavy tailed distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Svetlana Litvinova
  • Mervyn J Silvapulle

Abstract

In risk management areas such as reinsurance, the need often arises to construct a confidence interval for a quantile in the tail of the distribution. While different methods are available for this purpose, doubts have been raised about the validity of full-sample bootstrap. In this paper, we first obtain some general results on the validity of fullsample bootstrap for the tail quantile process. This opens the possibility of developing bootstrap methods based on tail statistics. Second, we develop a bootstrap method for constructing confidence intervals for high-quantiles of heavy-tailed distributions and show that it is consistent. In our simulation study, the bootstrap method for constructing confidence intervals for high quantiles performed overall better than the data tilting method, but none was uniformly the best; the data tilting method appears to be currently the preferred choice. Since the two methods are based on quite different approaches, we recommend that both methods be used side by side in applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Svetlana Litvinova & Mervyn J Silvapulle, 2018. "Bootstrapping tail statistics: Tail quantile process, Hill estimator, and confidence intervals for highquantiles of heavy tailed distributions," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 12/18, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
  • Handle: RePEc:msh:ebswps:2018-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.monash.edu/business/ebs/research/publications/ebs/wp12-2018.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Full-sample bootstrap; intermediate order statistic; Hill estimator; extreme value index; tail empirical process; tail quantile process.;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:msh:ebswps:2018-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Xibin Zhang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dxmonau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.