IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/ae9f666f4f604ed29a5d089d4649a8c4.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Independent Evaluation of Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+): Second Annual Report

Author

Listed:
  • Grace Anglin
  • Deborah Peikes
  • Dana Petersen
  • Ann O'Malley
  • Kristin Geonnotti
  • Arkadipta Ghosh
  • Pragya Singh
  • Ha Tu
  • Stacy Dale
  • Kaylyn Swankoski
  • Dana Jean-Baptiste
  • Janice Genevro
  • Sheila Hoag
  • Katie Morrison Lee
  • Rosalind Keith
  • Victoria Peebles
  • Amanda Markovitz
  • Min-Young Kim
  • Sean Orzol
  • Laura Blue
  • Ning Fu
  • Jessica Laird
  • Lauren Vollmer
  • Mariel Finucane
  • Laurie Felland
  • Linda Barterian
  • Rumin Sarwar
  • Jasmine Little
  • Rachel Machta
  • Genna Cohen
  • Mynti Hossain
  • Melanie Au
  • Grace Oh
  • Lee-Lee Ellis
  • Elizabeth Holland
  • Randall Brown
  • et al.

Abstract

The Second Annual Report presents findings from the independent evaluation of the first two years of CPC+ for practices that began the model in 2017. The report examines CPC+ participation, supports, implementation, and early impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Grace Anglin & Deborah Peikes & Dana Petersen & Ann O'Malley & Kristin Geonnotti & Arkadipta Ghosh & Pragya Singh & Ha Tu & Stacy Dale & Kaylyn Swankoski & Dana Jean-Baptiste & Janice Genevro & Sheila, "undated". "Independent Evaluation of Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+): Second Annual Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports ae9f666f4f604ed29a5d089d4, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:ae9f666f4f604ed29a5d089d4649a8c4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/pdfs/health/2020/cpc_plus_eval_annual_report_2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    primary care; comprehensive primary care; healthcare payment reform; Medicare; CMMI; CPC+; evaluation;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:ae9f666f4f604ed29a5d089d4649a8c4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.