IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Phone or FacetoFace Comparing Data from Surveys of People with Disabilities

Listed author(s):
  • Matt Sloan
  • Debra Wright
  • Kirsten Barrett
Registered author(s):

    This issue brief compares the quality of data collected for the National Beneficiary Survey (NBS), a survey of people with mental and physical impairments, via computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) and computer assisted personal interviewing (CAPI).

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: https://www.mathematica-mpr.com/-/media/publications/pdfs/phoneface_ib.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Mathematica Policy Research in its series Mathematica Policy Research Reports with number 8279d43ce4e9405ea819e7e7125f9e52.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 2
    Date of creation: 30 May 2010
    Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:8279d43ce4e9405ea819e7e7125f9e52
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Mathematica Policy Research P.O. Box 2393 Princeton, NJ 08543-2393 Attn: Communications

    Fax: (609) 799-0005
    Web page: http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:8279d43ce4e9405ea819e7e7125f9e52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joanne Pfleiderer)

    or (Joanne Lustig)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.