IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/6f64184bc9be43ef9e64511e1b3fe033.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Putting Rigorous Evidence Within Reach: Lessons Learned from the New Heights Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Susan Zief
  • John Deke
  • Ruth Neild

Abstract

This article uses an evaluation of New Heights, a school-based program for pregnant and parenting teens in the District of Columbia Public Schools, to illustrate how maternal and child health programs can obtain rigorous evaluations at reasonable cost using extant administrative data.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan Zief & John Deke & Ruth Neild, "undated". "Putting Rigorous Evidence Within Reach: Lessons Learned from the New Heights Evaluation," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 6f64184bc9be43ef9e64511e1, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:6f64184bc9be43ef9e64511e1b3fe033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10995-020-02901-x
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jessica Harper & Dean Hopper & Betsy Keating & Jessica Harding, "undated". "NM GRADS: Lessons Learned from Implementing a School-Based Program for Young Parents Across New Mexico," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 9b8d0289aaca4cdc95e6002c8, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Amy Margolis & Tara Rice & Mousumi Banikya-Leaseburg & Ann Person & Elizabeth Clary & Susan Zief & Katie Adamek & Jessica Harding, "undated". "Meeting the Multifaceted Needs of Expectant and Parenting Young Families Through the Pregnancy Assistance Fund," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 93129782c8794651b99379cc2, Mathematica Policy Research.
    3. Jessica F. Harding & Susan Zief & Amy Farb & Amy Margolis, "undated". "Supporting Expectant and Parenting Teens: New Evidence to Inform Future Programming and Research," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 3d66277097644a3888c59d335, Mathematica Policy Research.
    4. Subuhi Asheer & Susan Zief & Ruth Neild, "undated". "Roadmap for Effective School-Based Practices to Support Expectant and Parenting Youth: Lessons from the New Heights Program in Washington, DC," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 0954dc30aaf54c1897f4c55ad, Mathematica Policy Research.
    5. Jessica Harding & Jean Knab & Susan Zief & Kevin Kelly & Diana McCallum, "undated". "A Systematic Review of Programs to Promote Aspects of Teen Parents’ Self-Sufficiency: Supporting Educational Outcomes and Healthy Birth Spacing," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 05e656f1b4a54dae83654795b, Mathematica Policy Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:6f64184bc9be43ef9e64511e1b3fe033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.