IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mpr/mprres/6c6a86e28d7149c993713352eeceaa18.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Supporting Better Patient Decisions at the Point of Care: What Payers and Delivery Systems Can Do

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Collins
  • Cara Stepanczuk
  • Nyna Williams
  • Eugene Rich

Abstract

In this brief, we use four typical clinical cases to explore the barriers to and facilitators of patients’ decisions at the point of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Collins & Cara Stepanczuk & Nyna Williams & Eugene Rich, "undated". "Supporting Better Patient Decisions at the Point of Care: What Payers and Delivery Systems Can Do," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 6c6a86e28d7149c993713352e, Mathematica Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:6c6a86e28d7149c993713352eeceaa18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/pdfs/health/2016/supporting-better-patient-decisions-ib.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erin Fries Taylor & Stacy Dale & Deborah Peikes & Randall Brown & Arkadipta Ghosh & Jesse Crosson & Grace Anglin & Rosalind Keith & Rachel Shapiro, "undated". "Evaluation of the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative: First Annual Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 2790122c754b40a3a3f58266c, Mathematica Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deborah Peikes & Grace Anglin & Stacy Dale & Erin Fries Taylor & Ann O'Malley & Arkadipta Ghosh & Kaylyn Swankoski & Jesse Crosson & Rosalind Keith & Anne Mutti & Sheila Hoag & Pragya Singh & Ha Tu & , "undated". "Evaluation of the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative: Fourth Annual Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 31b437e81685456388e78e18b, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Deborah Peikes & Kaylyn Swankoski & Ann O’Malley & Lori Timmins & Dana Petersen & Kristin Geonnotti & Ha Tu & Pragya Singh & Arkadipta Ghosh & Stacy Dale & Rosalind Keith & Dana Jean-Baptiste & Shei, "undated". "Independent Evaluation of the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+): Third Annual Report," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 407dc5d96c61409d898002cd5, Mathematica Policy Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Point of Care; Patient; Payers; Delivery Systems; Health;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:6c6a86e28d7149c993713352eeceaa18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joanne Pfleiderer or Cindy George (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mathius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.