Avoiding the Common Wisdom Fallacy: The Role of Social Sciences in Constitutional Adjudication
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywordsproportionality; comparative law; Germany; Uncertainty; margin of appreciation; constitutional law; Canada; South Africa; social sciences; empiricism;
NEP fieldsThis paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2012-01-25 (All new papers)
StatisticsAccess and download statistics
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2011_22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marc Martin). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/mppggde.html .
We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .