IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mon/ceddtr/24.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le syndrome hollandais : théorie et vérification empirique au Congo et au Cameroun

Author

Abstract

As a result of the sharp oil price during the late 1970's and early 1980's, Congo's exports(and Cameroon's ones to a lesser extent) became more concentrated on oil. One may say that a Dutch Disease occurred if we refer to the Congo's core export sector. However, this study shows that there is no link between the oil price boom and the squeeze of the Congo's lagging sector through the relative price movement, mainly the real effective exchange rate. Comeroon seems to have scrape from the Dutch Disease as well. Dutch Disease models, which works through the price signal and refer to developing countries monetary and homogeneous economics, do not seem to be applicable to the much disarticulated(with imperfect markets) economies of both Congo and Cameroon. The spread of the Dutch Disease in these countries has been stemmed by the disarticulation of their less developed economies(with heterogeneous price systems), the stabilisation role played by the informal sector, the membership to the Franc CFA, the level of self-consumption and the level of monetization in the rural areas. (Full text in French)

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Philippe Koutassila, 1998. "Le syndrome hollandais : théorie et vérification empirique au Congo et au Cameroun," Documents de travail 24, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
  • Handle: RePEc:mon:ceddtr:24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ged.u-bordeaux4.fr/ceddt24.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • Q43 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Energy and the Macroeconomy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mon:ceddtr:24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.