Divide, Allocate et Impera: Comparing Allocation Strategies via Simulation
In stratified sampling, the problem of optimally allocating the sample size is of primary importance, especially when reliable estimates are required both for the overall population and for subdomains. To this purpose, in this paper we compare multiple standard allocation mechanisms. In particular, standard allocation methods are compared with an allocation method that has been recently adopted by the Italian National Statistical Institute: the Robust Optimal Allocation with Uniform Stratum Threshold (ROAUST) method. Standard allocation methods considered in this comparison are: (i) the optimal Neyman allocation, (ii) the multivariate Neyman allocation, (iii) the Costa allocation, (iv) the Bankier allocation, and (v) the Interior Point Non Linear Programming (IPNLP) allocation. Results show that the optimal Neyman allocation method outperforms the ROAUST method at the overall sample level, whereas the latter method performs better at the stratum level. Some results on the Nonlinear Programming method are particularly interesting.
|Date of creation:||04 May 2017|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Via Conservatorio 7, I-20122 Milan - Italy|
Phone: +39 02 50321522
Fax: +39 02 50321505
Web page: http://www.demm.unimi.it
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2017-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (DEMM Working Papers)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.