IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Classification problems and the dividing line between government and the market: an examination of NHS foundation trust classification in the UK


  • David PRICE


  • Allyson POLLOCK



Scientific evaluation of the impact of privatization on solidaristic health care goals is virtually non-existent. In this paper it is argued that an important cause of the poverty of evidence is researchers’ reliance on national accounting categories in comparisons of public and private sector performance. These categories are based on perfect market assumptions derived from microeconomics and provide highly restricted grounds for distinguishing between government and market sectors. In practice, definition of the public sector is made without reference to the attainment of substantive public policy goals such as universality. Therefore governments’ loss of ability to pursue solidaristic goals is not treated as a defining characteristic of privatization. The argument has important consequences for nonprofit providers. Whilst nonprofits are often classed as public sector their introduction can nonetheless reduce equity in health systems by eroding government control over resource allocation. National accounts sectoral classification cannot address this consequence of public sector reform and therefore it is often overlooked. The argument is illustrated with an example taken from the UK’s National Health Service.

Suggested Citation

  • David PRICE & Allyson POLLOCK, 2010. "Classification problems and the dividing line between government and the market: an examination of NHS foundation trust classification in the UK," Departmental Working Papers 2010-32, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
  • Handle: RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2010-32

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    Public economics; Public administration; National accounts; Non profit organizations;

    JEL classification:

    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • H42 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Publicly Provided Private Goods
    • H44 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2010-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (DEMM Working Papers) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask DEMM Working Papers to update the entry or send us the correct email address. General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.