IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Classification problems and the dividing line between government and the market: an examination of NHS foundation trust classification in the UK

Listed author(s):
  • David PRICE


  • Allyson POLLOCK


Registered author(s):

    Scientific evaluation of the impact of privatization on solidaristic health care goals is virtually non-existent. In this paper it is argued that an important cause of the poverty of evidence is researchers’ reliance on national accounting categories in comparisons of public and private sector performance. These categories are based on perfect market assumptions derived from microeconomics and provide highly restricted grounds for distinguishing between government and market sectors. In practice, definition of the public sector is made without reference to the attainment of substantive public policy goals such as universality. Therefore governments’ loss of ability to pursue solidaristic goals is not treated as a defining characteristic of privatization. The argument has important consequences for nonprofit providers. Whilst nonprofits are often classed as public sector their introduction can nonetheless reduce equity in health systems by eroding government control over resource allocation. National accounts sectoral classification cannot address this consequence of public sector reform and therefore it is often overlooked. The argument is illustrated with an example taken from the UK’s National Health Service.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano in its series Departmental Working Papers with number 2010-32.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 29 Sep 2010
    Handle: RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2010-32
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Via Conservatorio 7, I-20122 Milan - Italy

    Phone: +39 02 50321522
    Fax: +39 02 50321505
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2010-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (DEMM Working Papers)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.