IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Revenue Diversification in Large U.S. Cities

  • Howard Chernick

    (Hunter College)

  • Adam Langley

    (Lincoln Institute of Land Policy)

  • Andrew Reschovsky

    (University of Wisconsin–Madison)

The housing crisis and the Great Recession have placed tremendous fiscal pressure on the United States’ central cities. Cuts in state government fiscal assistance to local governments, combined with shrinking property tax bases, make it hard for local governments to maintain current levels of public services. Although the property tax remains the single most important own source of municipal government revenues, the decline in property values and the rising tide of foreclosures suggests that relying on more diversified local tax bases may strengthen the ability of cities to provide a range of public services for their residents. In this paper, we use a panel of data on the financing of the nation’s largest central cities from 1997 to 2008 to explore the role of revenue diversification in determining the level of general revenues of the United States’ largest central cities. Because expenditure responsibilities vary among city governments and because different levels and types of government play different roles, we develop the concept of constructed governments in order to allow us to compare the revenue-raising policies of large central cities across time and space. Our empirical results provide strong support for the hypothesis that a more diversified revenue structure generates more revenues than one that relies primarily on the property tax.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.munkschool.utoronto.ca/imfg/uploads/176/chernick_imfg_no._5_online.pdf
File Function: First version, 2011
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by University of Toronto, Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance in its series IMFG Papers with number 05.

as
in new window

Length: 24 pages
Date of creation: Dec 2011
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published in hard copy and online
Handle: RePEc:mfg:wpaper:05
Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.munkschool.utoronto.ca/imfg/

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mfg:wpaper:05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Enid Slack)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.