Author
Abstract
During the immediate postwar period, transit infrastructure underwent a vast expansion in the Toronto area. Tens of kilometres of new subway lines were built and commuter rail was introduced across one of the fastest-growing urban regions in Canada. This period was also characterized by a top-down approach to planning, with limited community consultation. Today, community consultation is formally embedded in the transit planning process, but is often the source of tension and mistrust. This paper describes what has changed since the 1960s. Using case studies of the Bloor-Danforth Subway (1966), the Davenport Diamond Project (2015– ), and the Hurontario Light Rail Transit Project (2010– ), the paper explores how planning in the immediate postwar period reflected a top-down, hierarchical structure that did not offer opportunities for meaningful community consultation and in which access, equity, and community-building were not priorities. In contrast, much contemporary planning has been characterized by the inability to satisfy an increased desire for public input in a meaningful way. The result is distrust between the public and planners.This paper suggests that community consultation should be integrated into the earliest stages of the planning process to ensure that such plans proceed into the expensive construction process, with its numerous contracted-out labour and technical aspects, with much broader support.
Suggested Citation
Nick Lombardo, 2020.
"The Evolution of Community Consultation in GTA Transit Planning,"
IMFG Perspectives
30, University of Toronto, Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance.
Handle:
RePEc:mfg:perspe:30
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mfg:perspe:30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Enid Slack (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imfutca.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.