IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mfg/perspe/14.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

National Urban Policy: A Roadmap for Canadian Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Abigail Friendly

    (Utrecht University)

Abstract

Over the past 50 years, interest in a national urban policy in Canada has waxed and waned. Although the 1960s represented a high water mark in terms of creating national institutions on urban issues, efforts to develop a national urban policy languished until the early 2000s.The 21st century has seen a renewed interest internationally in national urban policies. This paper draws on the experience of countries that have explicitly pursued national urban policies to solve complex and interrelated urban challenges: the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, Brazil, and France. It is unclear whether Canada will establish a similar policy or institution. If it does, however, this paper proposes three elements for a national urban policy: Collaborative governance involving cities as joint partners in deciding their fates with the provinces and federal government. Coordinating the diverse policies that affect the quality of life of Canadians living in cities. Robust policy, research, and monitoring mechanisms to identify what is working and best practices both nationally and internationally.

Suggested Citation

  • Abigail Friendly, 2016. "National Urban Policy: A Roadmap for Canadian Cities," IMFG Perspectives 14, University of Toronto, Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance.
  • Handle: RePEc:mfg:perspe:14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/82857/1/imfg_perspectives_no14_naturbanpolicy_friendly_2016.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2016
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Almos T. Tassonyi, 2017. "The Context and Challenges for Canada's Mid-Sized Cities," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 10(9), May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mfg:perspe:14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Enid Slack (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imfutca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.