Does financial liberalization affect the distribution of income between wages and profit ?
Neoclassical theory says that financial liberalization will make the cost of capital decrease, productivity increase and output grow. In reality this does not happen. A key to understanding why it is so is the link between financial liberalization and income distribution. After financial liberalizations both the real interest rate and the supply of credit to the non traded goods sector rise. If the monetary interest rate and the profit rate tend to be equal in the long run, a reshuffling of production favouring the non-traded goods sector will occur; for the mark-up may be higher in this sector than in the traded goods sector�due to the lack of international competition. Households, no more credit constrained,�will increase their demand for non traded goods; profits in this sector will increase too�due to the higher capacity utilization. On the other hand the likely fall in the propensity�� to save of capitalists will cause a slower capital accumulation. Thus neither investment nor productivity will rise. This may not be due to the working of real forces alone, such as trade �liberalization, but rather to the interplay of both monetary and real factors. A vicious circle of lower growth and rising inequality could be set in motion.
|Date of creation:||Oct 2004|
|Date of revision:||Oct 2008|
|Publication status:||Published in Economia Politica n.3 dicembre 2005 pp.439-456.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.unimc.it/dief
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mcr:wpdief:wpaper00024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Silvana Tartufoli)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.