IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mar/magkse/202609.html

Who Should Be Responsible for the Livelihoods of Older Adults? A Comparison of Gender Differences in Public Attitudes Across Four East Asian Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Bernd Hayo

    (Philipps-Universität Marburg)

  • Hiroyuki Ono

    (Toyo University)

Abstract

Using the East Asia Social Survey (EASS), this paper compares public opinion in four East Asian countries – China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan – regarding old-age livelihoods and care. We estimate multivariate logit models using answers to two questions as the dependent variables: (1) whether responsibility for older adults’ livelihoods lies with the government or families/individuals and (2) who within a family should care for older parents. Because these responsibilities are unevenly distributed between men and women, the analysis is conducted separately by gender and restricted to married respondents. Regarding (1), respondents in China and Japan tend to prefer the government option, whereas in Taiwan the families/individuals option is favoured. Men and women show similar preferences on average, although the individual characteristics underlying these preferences differ markedly by gender. Regarding (2), respondents in all four countries prefer ‘Any child or children, their families’, although in South Korea about one-third of the population favour ‘Eldest son, any son, or their families’. This latter option is more strongly preferred by men than by women in all four countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernd Hayo & Hiroyuki Ono, 2026. "Who Should Be Responsible for the Livelihoods of Older Adults? A Comparison of Gender Differences in Public Attitudes Across Four East Asian Countries," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202609, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
  • Handle: RePEc:mar:magkse:202609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cms.uni-marburg.de/en/fb02/research-groups/economics/macroeconomics/research/magks-joint-discussion-papers-in-economics/papers/2026-papers/09-2026.pdf
    File Function: First version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • O53 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Asia including Middle East

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mar:magkse:202609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bernd Hayo (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vamarde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.