IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/man/cgbcrp/84.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does Spread Really Predict the Short Rate? Explaining Empirical Anomalies in the Expectations Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Erdenebat Bataa
  • Dong H. Kim
  • Denise R. Osborn

Abstract

Empirical studies often find that the spread between longer and shorter rates does not have predictive power for future longer rates, violating the Expectations Theory (ET). Although the predictive power of the spread for future shorter rates is largely in accordance with the ET, especially when the forecast period is long, researchers often find this holds to varying degrees across samples (country-wise or time-wise). We show this pattern may be due to the powers of all tests depending on interest rates’ maturities and their persistency in small samples. This paper also compares the powers of tests of the ET against the under/overreaction and the time varying term premium alternatives across various maturity combinations, levels of persistency and sample sizes. Tests perform best and are comparable to each other at the shortest end of the term structure, but deteriorate as the distance between maturities of longer and shorter rates increase. However, this deterioration is of varying degrees for different tests and its speed diminishes as we depart from the shortest end. In general Lagrange multiplier and distance metric tests emerge as being the most powerful and least sensitive to interest rate maturities and their persistency.

Suggested Citation

  • Erdenebat Bataa & Dong H. Kim & Denise R. Osborn, 2006. "Does Spread Really Predict the Short Rate? Explaining Empirical Anomalies in the Expectations Theory," Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research Discussion Paper Series 84, Economics, The Univeristy of Manchester.
  • Handle: RePEc:man:cgbcrp:84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/schools/soss/cgbcr/discussionpapers/dpcgbcr84.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erdenebat Bataa & Dong H. Kim & Denise R. Osborn, 2007. "Expectations Hypothesis Tests in the Presence of Model Uncertainty," Discussion Paper Series 0703, Institute of Economic Research, Korea University.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:man:cgbcrp:84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marianne Sensier) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/semanuk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.